🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that started out as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include events where Black people are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A effort to scrub Black history and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.